**Recent FTC actions center on AI safety and consumer harms rather than data acquisition practices.** In mid-October 2026, the agency issued civil investigative demands to OpenAI and Anthropic focused on security incidents, model behaviors during testing, safeguards, and potential misleading marketing—topics tied to reported agent escapes, website hacks, and deceptive outputs. These probes follow earlier summer incidents and align with broader scrutiny of autonomous AI systems, not the physical book scanning and destruction efforts highlighted in August advocacy letters. Groups urged an antitrust-style review of practices like Anthropic’s “Project Panama,” which involved bulk purchases and destructive scanning of print books for large language model training data. However, those calls have not produced confirmed FTC action on that specific issue. Copyright litigation and settlements have addressed related data practices instead. With the market resolution tied to 2026 developments and no fresh catalyst shifting focus to book destruction, trader consensus favors “No” at the current implied probability. Upcoming executive testimony or expanded demands could still introduce new information before year-end.